Autoridade algorítmica e desincorporação epistêmica no capitalismo cognitivo digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54871/cl4c10aaPalavras-chave:
capitalismo cognitivo, autoridade algorítmica, desincorporação epistêmica, desigualdade cognitiva, justiça cognitiva situadaResumo
Este artigo analisa como a inteligência artificial (IA), no contexto do capitalismo cognitivo digital, reconfigura as condições de produção e legitimação do conhecimento. A partir de uma perspectiva crítica feminista e decolonial, desenvolve-se uma análise conceitual da IA como infraestrutura epistêmica. Como resultado, propõe-se o conceito de autoridade algorítmica para compreender uma forma emergente de legitimidade, e o de desincorporação epistêmica para explicar a invisibilização sistemática das condições materiais e situadas da cognição. Analisa-se também sua articulação com processos de opacidade, extrativismo de dados e desigualdade cognitiva na América Latina. Conclui-se que esses processos reconfiguram os critérios de validação do conhecimento.
Downloads
Referências
Abbass, Hussein A. (2019). Social integration of artificial intelligence: functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust. Cognitive Computation, 11(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0
Afroféminas (1 de abril de 2026) https://afrofeminas.com/
Beer, David (2019). The social power of algorithms. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351200677
Benjamin, Ruha (2019). Assessing risk, automating racism. Science, 366(6464), 421-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz3873
Blondeau, Olivier et al. (2004). Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
Burrell, Jenna (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big data & society, 3(1), 2053951715622512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
Burrell, Jenna y Fourcade, Marion (2021). The society of algorithms. Annual review of sociology, 47(1), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800
CENIA (1 de abril de 2026). https://cenia.cl
Correa L., Horacio (2025). Hacia una IA decolonial: marcos alternativos, resistencias y propuestas. Un estado de la cuestión. Revista Hipertextos,13(24), e106. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143924e106
Couldry, Nick y Mejias, Ulises A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & new media, 20(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1411
Crawford, Kate y Paglen, Trevor (2021). Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. Ai & Society, 36(4), 1105-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8
Data Cívica (1 de abril de 2026). https://datacivica.org/
Dencik, Lina et al. (2019). Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 873-881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268
D'ignazio, Catherine y Klein, Lauren F. (2023). Data feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Espinosa-Miñoso, Yuderkys (2014). Una crítica descolonial a la epistemología feminista crítica. El cotidiano (184), 7-12.
Eubanks, Virginia (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Nueva York: St. Martin's Press.
Facchini, Alessandro et al. (2024, November). Algorithmic Authority & AI Influence in Decision Settings: Theories and Implications for Design. En Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (pp. 472-474). https://doi.org/10.1145/3687272.3691363
Federici, Silvia (2016). Calibán y la bruja: mujeres, cuerpo y acumulación originaria. Quito: Editorial Abya-Yala.
Fraser, Nancy (2017). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. En Shaw, Jo y Štiks, ByIgor (Eds.) Citizenship rights (pp. 393-413). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315260211
Fraser, Nancy (2023). Cannibal capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and the planet and what we can do about it. Nueva York: Verso books.
Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Gillespie, Tarleton (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New media & society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Gillespie, Tarleton (2014). The relevance of algorithms. En Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. J. y Foot, K. A. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167-194). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001
Grosfoguel, Ramón (2016). Del extractivismo económico al extractivismo epistémico y ontológico. Revista Internacional de Comunicación y Desarrollo (RICD), 1(4), 33-45.
Grosfoguel, Ramón (2018). Extractivismo epistémico: del robo económico al robo epistemológico. En Reyes Escutia, F. (Coord.), Construir un NosOtros con la Tierra, Voces latinoamericanas por la descolonización del pensamiento y la acción ambientales (17-36). Ciudad de México: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas e Itaca.
Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Harding, Sandra (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kitchin, Rob (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big data & society, 1(1), 2053951714528481. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Lanoix, Monique (2013). Labor as embodied practice: The lessons of care work. Hypatia, 28(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12008
Lazzarato, Maurizio (1996) Immaterial Labour. En Hardt, M. and Virno, P. (Eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (pp.133-147). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lucarelli, Stefano y Fumagalli, Andrea (2013). Basic income and productivity in cognitive capitalism. En Figart, D. y Marangos, J. (Eds.) Living Standards and Social Well-Being (pp. 71-92). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315873961
Lugones, María (2008). Colonialidad y género. Tabula rasa (9), 73-102.
Lupton, Deborah (2017). Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New media & society, 19(10), 1599-1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817717515
McRobbie, Angela (2011). Reflections on feminism, immaterial labour and the post-Fordist regime. New formations, 70, 60-76. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.70.04.2010
Mignolo, Walter D. (2013). Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. En Mignolo, W. D. y Escobar, A. (Eds.) Globalization and the decolonial option (pp. 1-21). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868448
Moulier-Boutang, Yann. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Nueva York: Polity.
Mundo Sur (1 de abril de 2026). https://mundosur.org/nawi-ia/
Pasquale, Frank (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Peña, Paz y Varon, Joanna (2019). Consent to our data bodies: Lessons from feminist theories to enforce data protection. Coding Rights, 25. https://codingrights.org/docs/ConsentToOurDataBodies.pdf
Quijano, Aníbal (2001). Colonialidad del poder, globalización y democracia. Utopías, nuestra bandera: revista de debate político, 188, 97-123.
Ricaurte, Paola, Gómez-Cruz, Edgar y Siles, Ignacio (2024). Algorithmic governmentality in Latin America: Sociotechnical imaginaries, neocolonial soft power, and authoritarianism. Big data & society, 11(1), 20539517241229697. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241229697
Rodríguez, Óscar L. F. (2021). Planeación y evaluación desde una óptica decolonizadora: la relevancia de la gobernanza y soberanía de datos indígenas. En La evaluación de la gestión pública desde un enfoque decolonial: teorías, experiencias y aprendizajes (145-164). Tamaulipas: El Colegio de Tamaulipas-Red de Pensamiento Decolonial
Srnicek, Nick (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
Ståhl, Tore, Sormunen, Eero y Mäkinen, Marita (2021). Epistemic beliefs and internet reliance–is algorithmic authority part of the picture?. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(11-12), 726-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-01-2021-0004
Terranova, Tiziana (2012). Free labor. En Scholz, T. (Ed.) Digital labor (pp. 33-57). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203145791
Tubaro, Paola (2020). Whose intelligence is artificial intelligence?. Global Dialogue, 38-39. https://hal.science/hal-03029735v1
Vercellone, Carlo (2016). Capitalismo cognitivo y economía del conocimiento. Una perspectiva histórica y teórica. En Francisco Sierra Caballero y Francesco Maniglio (coords.) Capitalismo financiero y comunicación (pp. 17-50). Quito: Ciespal.
Vercellone, Carlo y Cardoso, Pablo (2016). Nueva división internacional del trabajo, capitalismo cognitivo y desarrollo en América Latina. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (133), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i133.2941
Walter, Maggie, y Carroll, Stephanie R. (2020). Indigenous data sovereignty, governance and the link to Indigenous policy. En Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Russo Carroll, S. y Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (Eds.) Indigenous data sovereignty and policy (pp. 1-20). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429273957
Zuboff, Shoshana. (2019). Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Alba Marcela Zárate Rochín
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
